Following a post presented in this blog few months ago ("Crowd is my only drug" http://environmental-exercise-physiology.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/crowd-is-my-only-drug-marlon-devonish.html), today we discuss again about crowds and satisfaction at sporting events. Given the potential links between the crowd and sports performance (e.g. many of team GBs medal winners commented on the impact of the crowd on their performance, see the Observer, Jamie Doward, Sunday 5 August 2012,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/aug/05/team-gb-medallists-credit-home-crowd), it is surprising that relatively little attention has been given to crowd satisfaction within academic research, or during the planning of sporting events.
Victoria Kendrick, a PhD Researcher working on crowd ergonomics, reports some of her findings:
"Despite the popularity of spectator
sporting events, academic research examining how the organisation of crowd
events can be enhanced remains relatively underdeveloped (Zhang
et al., 2007; Johnson,
2008). Additionally, in spite of possible
links between the crowd experience (comfort, safety, satisfaction and
performance) and sports performance, relatively little research has investigated
this relationship within academic research, or during the planning of sporting
events.
Research addressing crowd event
management has largely focused on crowd safety (Zhen et al., 2008), pedestrian flow modelling (Smith et al., 2009), and event management over recent
years (Getz,
2008): with substantial research around
public order policing (Reicher
et al., 2004; Drury & Stott, 2011), and hooliganism prevention (Stott et al., 2008). Consideration of the wellbeing of
the crowd, particularly crowd satisfaction, comfort and performance has
received less attention (Ryan
et al., 2010; Machleit
et al., 2000). Moreover, the extent to which academic research
findings influence the organisation of spectator sporting events is unclear.
The following research therefore explored the user experience of crowds within
sporting events:
Kendrick, V.L., Haslam, R.A., and Waterson, P.E. (2013). Crowd
Satisfaction at Spectator Sporting Events. Proceedings of the Ergonomics
& Human Factors Conference, 15-18 April 2013, Cambridge.
Due to the potential impact of the
crowd on sporting performance further attention on the satisfaction of the
crowd is required. Kendrick
et al. (2013) therefore presented findings from in depth semi-structured
interviews with event organisers and deliverers, investigating the
organisation, coordination, and security of a variety of spectator sporting
events. Safety was identified by those responsible for organising and
delivering events as a key priority, with less attention given to user
experience, crowd comfort and satisfaction. An evidence based description was
developed to embody findings of the current study, illustrating the central
issues that influence crowd satisfaction within spectator sporting events:
anticipation, facilities, and planning (prior to the event); influences and
monitoring (carried out during the event); and reflection (engaged in after the
event) (see Figure 1).
Figure 1:
Factors influencing crowd satisfaction within spectator sporting events
Due to the
potential influence of the crowd on sport performance, further research is
required to determine how to enhance the satisfaction of the crowd".
Victoria
Kendrick (BSc, MSc)
PhD Researcher
Loughborough
Design School
Loughborough
University, UK
References
Alexander E., B. (1995). Understanding and
planning for different spectator crowds. Safety Science, 18(4), 239-247.
Drury, J., & Stott, C. (2011).
Contextualising the crowd in contemporary social science. Contemporary
Social Science, 6(3), 275-288.
Getz, D. (2008). Event tourism: Definition,
evolution, and research. Tourism Management, 29(3), 403-428.
Johnson, C. W. (2008). Using evacuation
simulations for contingency planning to enhance the security and safety of the
2012 Olympic venues. Safety Science, 46(2), 302-322.
Kendrick, V.L., Haslam, R.A., and Waterson,
P.E. (2013). Crowd Satisfaction at Spectator Sporting Events. Proceedings of
the Ergonomics & Human Factors Conference, 15-18 April 2013, Cambridge.
Machleit, K. A., Eroglu, S. A., & Mantel,
S. P. (2000). Perceived retail crowding and shopping satisfaction: What
modifies this relationship? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(1), 29-42.
Reicher, S., Stott, C., Cronin, P., &
Adang, O. (2004). An integrated approach to crowd psychology and public order
policing. Policing-an International Journal of Police Strategies &
Management, 27(4), 558-572.
Ryan, C., Shih Shuo, Y., & Huan, T.
(2010). Theme parks and a structural equation model of determinants of visitor
satisfaction — janfusan fancyworld, taiwan. Journal of Vacation Marketing,
16(3), 185-199.
Smith, A., James, C., Jones, R., Langston,
P., Lester, E., & Drury, J. (2009). Modelling contra-flow in crowd dynamics
DEM simulation. Safety Science, 47(3), 395-404.
Stott, C., Adang, O., Livingstone, A., &
Schreiber, M. (2008). Tackling football hooliganism: A quantitative study of
public order, policing and crowd psychology. Psychology, Public Policy, and
Law, 14(2), 115-141.
Zhang, Q., Liu, M., Wu, C., & Zhao, G.
(2007). A stranded-crowd model (SCM) for performance-based design of stadium
egress. Building and Environment, 42(7), 2630-2636.
Zhen, W., Mao, L., & Yuan, Z. (2008).
Analysis of trample disaster and a case study – mihong bridge fatality in china
in 2004. Safety Science, 46(8), 1255-1270.
No comments:
Post a Comment